Reflex Locomotion Stimulation

This article is still missing information.

Reflex Locomotion Stimulation (RLS), more widely known as Vojta Therapy (VT), represents a distinct neurophysiological treatment modality designed to activate innate, genetically predetermined motor patterns stored within the central nervous system (CNS). Developed by Professor Václav Vojta, this approach utilizes specific, targeted afferent stimuli to elicit global, coordinated motor responses, aiming to improve postural control and movement efficiency .VT aims to activate innate motor programs, distinguishing it from conventional task-based approaches

While historically and perhaps most prominently associated with pediatric neurology, particularly in the early diagnosis and treatment of central coordination disturbances (CCD) and cerebral palsy (CP), the principles and applications of VT extend significantly beyond this domain. This perception often obscures its potential utility across a broader spectrum of functional disorders involving motor control. Consequently, VT holds relevance for musculoskeletal (MSK) physicians who manage patients across the lifespan presenting with conditions involving impaired motor control, postural instability, or movement dysfunction. Indications relevant to MSK practice include infantile postural asymmetry, congenital muscular torticollis, developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), scoliosis, and the musculoskeletal sequelae of neurological conditions such as stroke, multiple sclerosis (MS), peripheral nerve injuries, and even chronic low back pain (LBP). The applicability of VT to these varied conditions stems from its foundational principle of modulating central motor patterns, which can be disrupted in both neurological and certain complex MSK disorders.

Foundations of Reflex Locomotion Stimulation

Core Principles: Activating Innate Motor Programs

The central tenet of Vojta Therapy is the concept of Reflex Locomotion. This is defined as a coordinated, rhythmic, and involuntary activation of the entire skeletal musculature, coupled with a response from the central nervous system at various levels, triggered by specific, externally applied stimuli. The term "reflex" in this context denotes the automatic and predictable nature of the motor response to the therapeutic stimulus, rather than implying mediation via simple spinal reflex arcs.

The therapy is built upon the fundamental premise that all humans possess innate, genetically encoded motor programs or "global patterns" for fundamental movements, which are stored within the CNS. These patterns correspond to key developmental kinesiological milestones such as grasping, rolling, creeping, crawling, standing, and walking, and are considered accessible from birth, even before an infant can perform these actions spontaneously.

In individuals with CNS or musculoskeletal system disorders that affect motor control, access to these ideal movement patterns may be functionally blocked or impaired. The primary therapeutic goal of VT is therefore not to teach or practice specific functional skills, but rather to access, activate, and make these fundamental, stored patterns available to the CNS through targeted stimulation. This activation involves the entire body musculature in a coordinated, global manner, encompassing postural adjustments, uprighting against gravity, and phasic limb movements. The assumption is that by repeatedly activating these foundational patterns, they become more readily available for integration into the patient's spontaneous, voluntary movements and functional activities. This focus on activating innate global patterns via specific sensory input represents a key distinction from therapeutic approaches that concentrate on facilitating voluntary effort for specific movements or breaking down functional tasks into components. RLS targets a more fundamental level of motor organization within the CNS.

Neurophysiological Underpinnings: How RLS Influences the Central Nervous System

The proposed neurophysiological mechanism of RLS involves the precise application of tactile and proprioceptive stimuli to defined "zones" on the body. This specific sensory input is thought to trigger afferent volleys that activate the CNS at multiple levels, modulating neuronal activity. The therapy aims to influence the excitability and firing patterns of neuronal circuits involved in motor and postural control.

Evidence from neuroimaging and electrophysiological studies lends support to this proposed mechanism of CNS modulation. Studies utilizing electroencephalography (EEG), surface electromyography (sEMG), functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have demonstrated changes in brain and muscle activity during or following VT application. Specifically, VT has been shown to modulate electrical activity in brain areas responsible for movement planning, regulation, and execution, including the somatomotor cortex, premotor cortex, supplementary motor area (SMA), and subcortical structures such as the putamen (basal ganglia) and cerebellum. Some research also implicates the pontomedullary reticular formation, a structure involved in postural control and locomotion. Significant differences in cortical activity (e.g., in premotor cortex, SMA) and muscle activity have been observed in adults undergoing VT compared to control conditions in meta-analyses. This growing body of objective physiological data provides biological plausibility for the therapy's effects, suggesting a tangible impact on the CNS, even as high-quality clinical outcome studies continue to evolve.

The repetitive nature of the stimulation in VT is believed to harness principles of neuroplasticity. Prof. Vojta hypothesized that repeated activation of these reflex-like movements could lead to a "freeing of a switch" or "new networking" within functionally blocked neural pathways between the brain and spinal cord. Consistent activation of specific muscle groups in coordinated patterns may promote the formation or strengthening of relevant synaptic connections, making the desired motor patterns more accessible for spontaneous, voluntary use over time.This aligns with contemporary understanding of motor learning and the brain's capacity for reorganization following injury or dysfunction.

Furthermore, studies using polyelectromyography (pEMG) suggest that the muscle activation elicited by VT is transmitted through specific spinal pathways. Stimulation of a zone on one limb can evoke responses in contralateral and ipsilateral muscles of other limbs, suggesting the involvement of intersegmental pathways, potentially including long propriospinal tract neurons that facilitate crossed and coordinated responses characteristic of locomotion.

The Technique of Reflex Locomotion Stimulation

The application of Vojta Therapy is highly specific, involving precise patient positioning, targeted stimulation zones, and the elicitation of distinct global motor patterns.

Stimulation Zones and Patient Positioning Strategies

RLS is activated from three primary starting positions: prone (lying on the stomach), supine (lying on the back), and side-lying. These fundamental positions serve as the base from which the therapist works, but Prof. Vojta described over thirty variations, allowing the therapist to adapt the setup based on the individual patient's clinical presentation and therapeutic goals.

From these positions, the therapist applies stimulation to specific, defined areas on the body known as "stimulation zones." These zones are located on the trunk, arms, and legs, often overlying muscles or bony prominences. Prof. Vojta identified ten primary zones. Examples include the acromion, the medial or lateral femoral epicondyle, the breast zone (located in the intercostal space, typically 7th/8th ribs, on the mid-axillary or mammillary line), the calcaneus (heel bone), and the gluteal region.

The stimulation itself consists of applying purposeful, directed, and usually light pressure to the selected zone(s). This pressure is often combined with resistance provided by the therapist against the patient's incipient movements that are part of the elicited reflex pattern. For instance, during reflex creeping, the therapist might resist the patient's tendency to rotate their head. This resistance is not intended to overpower the movement but rather to increase the isometric contraction of the involved muscles, thereby enhancing the overall activation and propagation of the motor pattern throughout the body. The precise angles of the joints in the starting position and the direction and magnitude of the pressure and resistance are critical components of the technique and are adjusted by the therapist. The specificity involved in selecting zones, positioning the patient accurately, and applying the correct stimulus underscores that RLS is a structured technique demanding considerable skill and precision from the therapist. This requirement for precise application has implications for both therapist training and the consistency needed for effective treatment, including home programs carried out by parents or caregivers.

Eliciting Global Patterns: Reflex Creeping and Reflex Rolling

The application of stimuli in the prescribed manner aims to activate two fundamental, global coordination complexes, or patterns, of reflex locomotion: reflex creeping and reflex rolling.

Reflex Creeping:

This pattern is primarily elicited from the prone position, typically with the patient's head resting on the supporting surface and rotated to one side. In newborns, the full pattern can sometimes be activated from a single stimulation zone, whereas older children and adults often require stimulation of multiple zones simultaneously. The elicited response is a type of creeping movement, which predominantly occurs in a diagonal or "cross-pattern"—meaning the contralateral arm and leg move in coordination to support the body and propel the trunk forward. This pattern inherently includes components of postural control (stabilizing the body), uprighting mechanisms (extension against gravity), and purposeful, alternating stepping movements of the limbs. Therapeutically, reflex creeping aims to activate the musculature necessary for support, grasping, rising, and walking. It also engages the respiratory muscles, abdominal wall, pelvic floor musculature, and even influences functions like swallowing and coordinated eye movements.

Reflex Rolling:

This complex involves movement sequences that transition the body from a supine position, through side-lying, ultimately leading towards a quadrupedal (crawling) posture. While elements of this sequence appear spontaneously in typically developing infants around 6-9 months of age, VT can elicit components of this pattern even in newborns. The therapy utilizes different phases of reflex rolling:

• Phase 1 (Supine Lying): Starting with the patient supine, arms and legs extended, stimulation (e.g., of the breast zone) initiates a rotation towards the side. The therapist typically resists the accompanying head rotation. Key reactions activated in this phase include extension of the spine, flexion of the legs against gravity, preparatory activation of the arms for future support, lateral eye movements, initiation of swallowing, deepened breathing, and coordinated activation of abdominal muscles.
• Phase 2 (Side-Lying): This phase begins in the side-lying position and encompasses movements analogous to spontaneous rolling, crawling, and lateral shifting. The underlying (weight-bearing) arm and leg provide support and move the body upwards and forwards against gravity. Muscle activation progresses functionally down the supporting limb (e.g., from shoulder to hand). The sequence culminates as the rolling movement transitions into a crawling position. Fundamental reactions include coordinated flexion and extension of upper and lower limbs with enhanced support function on the weight-bearing side, spinal extension, and active head control against gravity in the side-lying posture.

The direct link between these elicited patterns (creeping and rolling) and the fundamental sequences observed in normal human motor development (ontogenesis) reinforces the therapy's theoretical underpinnings. VT aims to tap into these inherent blueprints for posture and locomotion, making it a potentially valuable tool when these developmental pathways are disrupted.

Clinical Applications

While VT originated in pediatric neurology, its application extends to a variety of conditions involving motor control dysfunction that are frequently encountered by MSK physicians across different age groups.

Central Coordination Disturbances (CCD) in Infancy

Central Coordination Disturbance (CCD) is a diagnostic term used, particularly within the Vojta framework, to describe deviations from typical neuromotor development in infants. These deviations are identified through specific Vojta diagnostic assessments, including observation of spontaneous movement, evaluation of seven postural reactions (provoked changes in body position), and assessment of primitive reflexes. CCD is considered a risk factor for later neurological impairments, including cerebral palsy. There is some evidence in this setting. Early intervention for CCD shows improved motor outcomes (observational studies).

Scoliosis and Postural Asymmetry

VT is applied in cases of infantile postural asymmetry and certain types of scoliosis. The therapeutic rationale is that the global patterns elicited by VT activate the paravertebral musculature bilaterally in a coordinated manner, promoting spinal elongation, reducing asymmetry, and improving postural control. For infantile postural asymmetry, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) directly compared VT to Neurodevelopmental Treatment (NDT)/Bobath. Using a validated video-based asymmetry scale, the study found that while both therapies led to significant improvements over eight weeks. Regarding idiopathic scoliosis (IS), evidence for VT as a standalone corrective treatment appears less robust in the available literature.

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH)

VT has been proposed as a therapeutic option for DDH, particularly in cases where underlying neuromotor factors, such as those seen in CCD, are suspected to contribute to the hip instability. The therapy aims to activate physiological muscle patterns around the hip joint, promoting active joint centering and stimulating normal acetabular development through normalized biomechanical forces. This approach contrasts with passive methods like the Pavlik harness or abduction bracing, which primarily rely on positioning. There may be potential benefit suggested by case reports showing hip centralization, especially if neuromotor factors are present. Low evidence level due to lack of comparative trials.

Neurological Conditions

Several neurological conditions with significant MSK manifestations are indications for VT:

• Cerebral Palsy (CP): Mixed evidence. Meta-analyses often show no overall GMFM difference vs controls, but individual studies/reviews suggest benefits for specific aspects (sitting, rolling, trunk control, early milestones).
• Stroke: Early evidence from a pilot RCT showing VT improved postural control (TCT) and arm function (MESUPES) significantly more than standard physiotherapy within 9 days post-stroke (severe hemiparesis).
• Multiple Sclerosis (MS): Early evidence. It may improve balance. Preliminary/low-to-moderate evidence for improving gait and potentially enhancing conventional therapy outcomes.

Low Back Pain

The application of VT principles, often integrated within the framework of Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization (DNS), represents a neurodevelopmentally-based approach to managing LBP, including cases associated with herniated discs. This approach posits that dysfunctional core muscle activation patterns and postural control deficits, potentially reflecting deviations from ideal developmental stabilization strategies, contribute significantly to chronic LBP. VT directly activates core musculature, including deep spinal stabilizers and abdominal muscles, aiming to restore balanced muscle activity and improve automatic trunk stabilization.

Evidence supporting this approach is growing. A 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis specifically evaluating DNS/Vojta therapy for LBP included twelve studies. The analysis found statistically significant improvements favoring the DNS/Vojta intervention compared to control groups (which included non-intervention, conventional physiotherapy, or sham therapy) for pain intensity (Standardized Mean Difference = -1.09, 95% CI [-1.74, -0.4], p=0.001), disability severity measured by scales like the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (SMD = -0.91, 95% CI [-1.8, -0.], p=0.002), and quality of life (SMD = 1.05, 95% CI [0., 1.96], p=0.02). Furthermore, an RCT comparing VT combined with standard care (including electrotherapy and massage) versus standard care alone for chronic LBP found significantly better results in the combined VT group regarding improvements in posture, depression scores, self-esteem, and functional parameters. Another RCT demonstrated that adding VT to standard therapy was more effective than standard therapy alone for improving pain, function, range of motion, strength, and quality of life in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome, a condition often linked to postural control deficits. However, one RCT comparing VT plus conventional physical therapy versus conventional physical therapy alone for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) found significant improvements within both groups over two weeks, but no statistically significant differences between the groups for pain, disability, mobility, strength, or quality of life. The application of a neurodevelopmentally grounded therapy like VT/DNS to a prevalent MSK condition such as LBP suggests a potential shift in perspective, moving beyond addressing only local tissue pathology towards restoring fundamental motor control and stabilization patterns governed by the CNS. This may prompt MSK physicians to consider assessing underlying motor control strategies in chronic LBP patients and view RLS/DNS as a therapeutic option targeting these central mechanisms.

Efficacy of RLS

Assessing the efficacy of RLS/VT requires careful consideration of the available scientific literature, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, RCTs, and other study designs.

Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

A 2024 SR and MA was reviewed. This supported the neurophysiological mechanisms of VT, demonstrating measurable changes in cortical and muscle activity during its application.

Regarding clinical efficacy, the picture is more nuanced. Reviews indicate potential usefulness for respiratory, neurological, and orthopedic pathologies. Significant positive effects have been reported in a meta-analysis for specific outcomes, such as improved balance in adults with MS and reduced pain and disability in individuals with LBP (when considering DNS/Vojta).

The overall quality of the available evidence for clinical outcomes is often limited. Common methodological weaknesses cited in the primary studies include lack of adequate randomization or allocation concealment, insufficient blinding (of participants, therapists, or assessors), incomplete outcome data reporting, potential for selective reporting bias, small sample sizes, and heterogeneity in interventions and outcome measures. For instance, meta-analyses evaluating the effect of VT on gross motor function (e.g., GMFM scores) in pediatric populations (including CP) often found non-significant differences compared to control groups..

Evidence Summary for Key MSK-Relevant Conditions

Synthesizing the findings for conditions most pertinent to MSK physicians reveals a varied landscape of evidence:

• Infant CCD/Postural Asymmetry: Evidence appears relatively stronger here compared to some other areas. An RCT demonstrated VT superiority over NDT for reducing postural asymmetry, providing moderate-level evidence for this specific comparison. Observational studies support early VT for improving outcomes in infants diagnosed with CCD, suggesting low-to-moderate quality evidence for this indication.
• Scoliosis: Direct evidence for VT correcting structural scoliosis is limited in the reviewed materials. DNS/Vojta combined with exercises shows preliminary promise for improving stability in IS. VT is effective for infantile postural asymmetry, which can be a precursor or associated finding. Evidence for scoliosis correction itself remains low/preliminary.
• Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH): Support comes primarily from case reports documenting improvements in Graf classification and hip centralization. While these suggest potential benefit, particularly if a neuromotor component is present, the lack of comparative trials means the evidence level is currently very low.
• Stroke (Acute Phase): A single pilot RCT provides moderate-level evidence suggesting VT significantly improves postural control (TCT) and upper extremity motor function (MESUPES) compared to standard physiotherapy in the first 9 days post-stroke in patients with severe hemiparesis. Replication in larger trials is needed.
• Multiple Sclerosis (MS): Evidence for improving balance is supported by meta-analysis (significant effect, p<0.03), suggesting moderate-level evidence for this outcome. Evidence for gait improvement exists from individual trials and systematic reviews, but is considered more preliminary or limited, rating as low-to-moderate.
• Low Back Pain (LBP): Meta-analysis of DNS/Vojta shows significant benefits for pain, disability, and quality of life compared to controls, providing moderate-level evidence. RCTs adding VT to standard care also show benefits over standard care alone for chronic LBP and related conditions like impingement syndrome. Evidence appears moderate for LBP management.
• Cerebral Palsy (CP): Evidence is mixed. While meta-analyses often show non-significant differences in overall gross motor function compared to controls, numerous individual studies and reviews report benefits for specific aspects like sitting ability, trunk control, early motor milestone acquisition, and potentially respiratory function. The evidence might be considered moderate for these specific outcomes, but lower for overall gross motor function superiority.

RLS Compared to Other Approaches

Versus Neurodevelopmental Treatment (NDT)/Bobath

Both are neurophysiological. NDT focuses on inhibiting abnormal tone/reflexes and facilitating voluntary movement via handling. VT activates innate global patterns via zone stimulation. Limited comparative evidence (one RCT favored VT for infant asymmetry, another found no difference in Down syndrome).

Versus Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF)

PNF is another approach that utilizes proprioceptive input to enhance motor output, sharing this general principle with VT. Both may incorporate resistance. However, PNF techniques typically involve guiding the patient through specific diagonal and spiral patterns of voluntary movement, often using verbal commands and techniques like rhythmic initiation, combinations of isotonics, or hold-relax to improve muscle strength, flexibility, coordination, and functional mobility. VT, conversely, uses specific trigger points to elicit involuntary, global, pre-programmed locomotor patterns (reflex creeping and rolling) that are not based on diagonal patterns of voluntary effort.

Direct comparative evidence between VT and PNF is scarce. One RCT comparing PNF and NDT/Bobath found them to be equally effective in improving trunk control after stroke. A small pilot study (n=4) comparing VT and PNF techniques for improving trunk control in children with CP reported that both methods were effective, with no significant difference found between the two groups.

Versus Conventional/Task-Specific Physiotherapy

VT activates underlying patterns rather than directly practicing tasks or functions. Some studies show VT superior or additive (acute stroke, LBP, specific CP skills); others show no significant difference (LDH, MS balance trial). Comparative studies yield varied results.

Unique Contributions of RLS

Based on its principles and available evidence, RLS/VT appears to offer several unique aspects compared to other approaches:

• Activation of Innate Patterns: Its primary mechanism is distinct, focusing on triggering pre-programmed locomotor complexes rather than facilitating voluntary effort or practicing tasks.
• Influence on Automatic Control: It may have a more direct impact on the automatic, subconscious aspects of postural control and movement regulation.
• Global Activation: The elicited patterns involve coordinated activation of musculature throughout the body, potentially addressing widespread dysfunction more holistically.
• Broad Applicability: Its principles allow application across a wide age range (infancy to adulthood) and diverse neurological and MSK conditions characterized by central motor control deficits.

Practical Considerations for Clinical Practice

Integrating RLS/VT into clinical practice requires careful consideration of patient selection, potential benefits and limitations, contraindications, and how it fits within a comprehensive treatment strategy.

Identifying Suitable Candidates for RLS

• Clinical Indications: VT has a broad range of indications. For MSK physicians, relevant conditions include:
  • Infants: Central coordination disturbance (CCD), infantile postural asymmetry, congenital muscular torticollis, developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).
  • Children and Adults: Cerebral palsy (CP), scoliosis (particularly postural components), sequelae of stroke or multiple sclerosis (MS) affecting motor control, peripheral nerve injuries (e.g., brachial plexus palsy, spina bifida), various myopathies, chronic low back pain (LBP), herniated discs with associated motor control deficits, trunk instability, and associated issues like impaired breathing, swallowing, or chewing functions.
• Age Range: VT is applicable across the entire lifespan, from premature infants (as early as 28 weeks gestation) through newborns, children, adolescents, and adults. However, early intervention, particularly in infancy, is often emphasized to leverage greater neuroplasticity and prevent the consolidation of abnormal compensatory movement patterns before they become habitual.
• Patient State and Cooperation: The patient must be able to tolerate the required therapeutic positions and the applied stimulation. While the core activation is reflexive, older children and adults may benefit from being concentrated during the session. Although severe communication impairment was an exclusion criterion in one stroke trial, the reflexive nature means active willful cooperation is not strictly necessary for eliciting the patterns. The patient's general medical stability is important (see contraindications).
• Underlying Pathology: VT appears most relevant for conditions where there is a clear disruption in the CNS control of posture and movement. Its application in MSK conditions like DDH, scoliosis, or LBP often presupposes an underlying neuromotor component contributing to the pathology.

Anticipated Benefits and Potential Outcomes

Successful application of VT can lead to improvements across multiple domains:

• Motor Control: Enhanced automatic postural control and equilibrium during movement. Activation of uprighting mechanisms against gravity. Facilitation of goal-directed limb movements (phasic mobility) and improved grasp and support functions of hands and feet.
• Musculoskeletal System: Improved spinal alignment, segmental mobility, and functional capacity; reduced postural asymmetries. Promotion of joint centration, particularly at the hip and shoulder.
• Pain Modulation: Reduction in pain associated with conditions like LBP or shoulder impingement.
• Orofacial and Respiratory Function: Activation of respiratory muscles leading to deeper, more balanced breathing; facilitation of sucking, swallowing, and chewing functions; improved coordination of eye movements and orofacial muscles.
• Autonomic and Other Functions: Potential positive effects on autonomic regulation, including improved skin circulation, normalization of sleep-wake cycles, and activation of bladder and bowel regulatory functions.
• Psychosocial Aspects: As motor competence improves, patients may experience reduced frustration, improved emotional balance, enhanced ability to communicate needs, increased concentration, and motivation.

Recognizing Limitations, Challenges, and Contraindications

Despite its potential benefits, VT also presents limitations and challenges:

• Evidence Quality: As discussed, the quality of clinical outcome evidence is variable, with limitations in study design affecting the certainty of conclusions for some indications.
• Technique Dependence: Effectiveness relies heavily on the precise and consistent application of the technique by a trained therapist and by parents/caregivers performing the home program. Ensuring fidelity of home application can be challenging.
• Demanding Regimen: VT requires a significant time commitment, especially for infants where sessions are recommended multiple times per day (e.g., up to four times daily, each lasting 5-20 minutes). This places considerable demands on parents or caregivers.
• Infant Crying: A common reaction in infants during VT sessions is crying, which stems from the unfamiliar and strenuous nature of the activation, not typically from pain. While this usually subsides with familiarization and immediately after sessions, it can be distressing for parents and may negatively impact compliance if not properly addressed through education and support. This demanding nature and potential for infant distress are significant practical hurdles that must be openly discussed with families when considering referral. Parental motivation, understanding, and support systems are critical factors for successful implementation.
• Specialized Training: Proper application requires specialized postgraduate training for therapists. Access to certified Vojta therapists may be limited geographically.
• Does Not Replace Function: VT activates underlying patterns but does not directly practice functional skills like walking or specific ADLs. Integration into function relies on the CNS incorporating the activated patterns spontaneously.

Integrating RLS into Comprehensive Treatment Strategies

RLS/VT should not be viewed as a standalone therapy but rather as a component that can be integrated into a broader, multidisciplinary rehabilitation plan.

• It can be used concurrently with other therapies such as occupational therapy, speech therapy, and special educational interventions. By improving foundational postural control and motor organization, VT may enhance the patient's ability to participate in and benefit from these other therapies.
• Studies suggest potential synergistic effects when VT is combined with other physiotherapy approaches like NDT/Bobath or conventional exercises.
• Consideration should be given to initiating VT early in the rehabilitation process, especially for infants with developmental concerns or in acute conditions like stroke, to maximize the potential impact on neuroplasticity and minimize the development of maladaptive compensatory strategies.
• Effective integration requires clear communication and collaboration between the referring MSK physician, the certified Vojta therapist, the patient and family, and any other healthcare professionals involved in the patient's care. Establishing shared goals and understanding each modality's role is crucial.

Conclusion

VT/RLS is a distinct neurorehabilitation technique activating innate motor patterns to influence CNS control of posture and movement, supported by neurophysiological evidence. It shows promise for specific MSK-relevant conditions like infant neuromotor issues, MS balance, early stroke recovery, and LBP by addressing central control deficits.

However, clinical outcome evidence varies, and the therapy is demanding (training, adherence, infant crying). It is a specialized tool, potentially valuable for patients with clear central postural control deficits or where standard methods are insufficient. Further high-quality research is needed to solidify efficacy and optimize application.