Joint Biomechanics
Biomechanics, the study of mechanical forces and their effects on living systems, is fundamental to understanding musculoskeletal medicine. While often perceived as complex due to its basis in physics and mathematics, grasping core biomechanical principles provides invaluable insight into normal joint function, pathological processes, and clinical assessment. This article defines the fundamental concepts of joint range of motion, differentiates between physiological and accessory movements, and explains the interplay between bone movement and joint surface mechanics.
Fundamental Joint Movements
Types of Motion: Translation and Rotation
Any motion between two bodies connected at a joint can be described as either a translation, a rotation, or a combination of both. These are considered fundamental movements because they cannot be mathematically resolved into simpler motions (unlike complex movements like circumduction, which combines several fundamental motions).
- Rotation: This involves angular displacement around a central point or axis. Every point on the moving bone undergoes the same angular change, but the linear distance traveled varies depending on the distance from the center of rotation. Think of bending your elbow: points near the elbow joint move a shorter distance than your hand, but both traverse the same angle. Rotations require a force couple – two forces acting in opposite directions that are not aligned – to occur. In the body, this couple is often formed by a muscle's pulling force and a reaction force generated by joint contact or ligament tension resisting the muscle's direct pull.
- Translation: Characterized by linear displacement, where every point on the moving body travels the same distance in the same direction. If one bone slides straight across another without any angular change, that is a translation.
These movements occur in three dimensions and can be described relative to three principal axes (often related to the body's anatomical planes: sagittal, coronal/frontal, and axial/transverse). For any joint, there are potentially 12 fundamental movements to consider.
The Six Degrees of Freedom and Standard Joint Movements
There are six translations (Sliding/Gliding) - Movement along each of the three axes in both positive and negative directions (e.g., anterior/posterior glide, medial/lateral glide, compression/distraction). And there are six rotations (Angular Motion/Bending/Twisting): Movement around each of the three axes in both positive and negative directions (e.g., flexion/extension, abduction/adduction, internal/external rotation).
- Translations (Sliding/Gliding):
- Along the Sagittal Axis: Anterior / Posterior Translation
- Along the Coronal Axis: Medial (Right) / Lateral (Left) Translation
- Along the Axial Axis: Superior (Compression) / Inferior (Distraction/Traction)
- Rotations (Angular Motion/Bending/Twisting):
- Around the Coronal Axis (in the Sagittal Plane): Anterior Sagittal Rotation (e.g., Flexion-like bending forward) / Posterior Sagittal Rotation (e.g., Extension-like bending backward)
- Around the Sagittal Axis (in the Coronal Plane): Medial (Right) Coronal Rotation / Lateral (Left) Coronal Rotation (Side-bending)
- Around the Axial Axis (in the Horizontal Plane): Medial (Internal/Left) Axial Rotation / Lateral (External/Right) Axial Rotation (Twisting)
Note on Terminology: While engineering often uses X, Y, Z axes (e.g., X often being coronal, Y axial, Z sagittal), relating movements to anatomical planes (sagittal, coronal, axial/horizontal) is often more intuitive in a clinical context. Compression and Distraction are preferred terms for axial translation as they remain consistent regardless of patient orientation (standing vs. lying down).
While every joint theoretically possesses these 12 potential movements, the actual range of motion for each varies greatly depending on the joint's specific anatomy (bone shape, ligaments, muscles). Some movements might have a near-zero amplitude in a healthy joint. Understanding these fundamental possibilities is key to analyzing normal function, pathology, and clinical examination.
Generating Motion: Forces and Force Couples
Understanding how these movements are produced requires considering the forces involved:
- Translation: A single, unopposed force applied to an object will tend to cause translation. The object may slightly reorient itself so its center of mass aligns with the force vector, but the primary movement will be linear.
- Rotation: To produce a pure rotation, a force couple is required. A force couple consists of two equal, parallel forces acting in opposite directions but not along the same line. In the musculoskeletal system, this often occurs when a muscle contracts (applying one force) and encounters resistance, either from contact with another bone or tension in a ligament, which provides the second, opposing force necessary to create the turning effect (angular motion). For example, the brachialis muscle pulls the forearm generally towards the humerus (compressive/translatory tendency), but contact at the elbow joint provides the reaction force, creating a couple that results in elbow flexion (rotation).
Clinical Application Framework
This 12-movement framework provides a powerful tool:
Anatomy/Joint Design: When considering a joint's structure, one can ask which of the 12 movements are desired and which are undesired. The shape of the bones, the arrangement of ligaments, and the action of muscles can then be understood as features designed to permit required motions and prohibit or limit unwanted ones.
Pathology: Different diseases or injuries affect specific structures. Damage to ligaments might permit excessive translation or rotation in a specific plane. Muscle weakness might limit active rotation. Analyzing which of the 12 standard movements are abnormal helps deduce the nature and location of the pathology.
Clinical Examination: A systematic clinical examination should, in principle, assess all 12 potential movements for any joint. While textbooks often present abbreviated algorithms or named tests (e.g., Lachman's, McMurray's), these are often assessing specific combinations or individual components of these 12 fundamental motions. A comprehensive approach involves testing for anterior/posterior translation, medial/lateral translation, compression/distraction, sagittal rotation, coronal rotation, and axial rotation. Even movements with normally near-zero amplitude (like axial rotation in an interphalangeal joint) should be assessed. Finding unexpected motion (e.g., coronal rotation in a finger joint) immediately points to pathology (e.g., collateral ligament failure) by indicating the failure of the structure normally responsible for preventing that specific movement.
Definition of Joint Range of Motion
From a biomechanical standpoint, joint range of motion (ROM) signifies the extent of movement possible at an articulation. It encompasses both the distance and direction (e.g., flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal rotation, external rotation) through which a joint can typically travel. ROM is a quantifiable measure, usually expressed in angular units (degrees) using goniometry or linear units (distance) for specific motions. It serves as a fundamental parameter for assessing joint function, with deviations from established norms potentially indicating pathology. Normal mobility is considered necessary for efficient human movement.
Physiological ROM: Osteokinematics
Physiological ROM refers to the macroscopic, angular movements of bones relative to each other, occurring within the cardinal planes of motion around specific joint axes. These are the classical, voluntary movements such as flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, and rotation that are readily observable and measurable. This gross movement of bones is termed osteokinematics. Osteokinematic motion can be further categorized based on the source of the movement force:
Active Range of Motion (AROM): This is the arc of motion achieved through unassisted, voluntary contraction of the muscles acting across the joint. AROM reflects not only the available joint range but also the patient's willingness to move, neuromuscular control, and muscle strength. It represents the functional range the individual can actively utilize.
Passive Range of Motion (PROM): This is the arc of motion attained when the joint is moved solely by an external force (e.g., an examiner, gravity, or equipment) without any active muscle contribution from the patient. PROM typically exceeds AROM slightly. This difference arises because passive movement eliminates limitations imposed by muscle weakness or activation deficits, and the external force can apply a gentle stretch to the elastic components of periarticular tissues (ligaments, capsule, passive muscle elements) at the end range. Furthermore, PROM avoids the potential limitation caused by the bulk of contracting muscles (soft tissue approximation). PROM assessment isolates the mechanical constraints imposed by the joint surfaces, capsule, ligaments, and passive muscle-tendon unit tension, providing a measure of the total available anatomical range.
The distinction between AROM and PROM is clinically significant. When PROM is normal or near-normal, but AROM is markedly limited, the underlying cause is less likely to be a primary joint restriction (such as capsular tightness or bony block) and more likely related to factors impairing active movement, such as muscle weakness, pain inhibition during contraction, nerve injury, or disruption of the muscle-tendon unit. Understanding these physiological motions provides the baseline for defining hypomobility as a reduction in this range and hypermobility as an increase, particularly in PROM.
Accessory Movements: Arthrokinematics and Joint Play
While osteokinematics describes the gross movement of bones, arthrokinematics focuses on the subtle, intricate movements occurring between the articulating joint surfaces themselves. These small-amplitude motions are essential for achieving full, smooth, and pain-free osteokinematic ROM. The primary arthrokinematic movements are:
Roll: A rotary movement where new points on one joint surface contact new points on the opposing surface, analogous to a tire rolling on pavement. Rolling contributes significantly to the angular displacement of the bone.
Glide (or Slide): A translatory movement where a single point on one surface contacts multiple points on the opposing surface, akin to a tire skidding or an ice skate blade moving over ice. Gliding allows the joint surfaces to remain congruent during movement.
Spin: A rotary movement where one joint surface rotates on the opposing surface around a stationary mechanical axis, like a spinning top. Examples include shoulder internal/external rotation at 90 degrees abduction or radioulnar pronation/supination.
In addition to these fundamental motions, two related concepts are important:
Joint Play: These are small, passive translatory (glide) or distractive movements available at a synovial joint that are not under voluntary control. They can only be produced by an external force. Assessing the amount and quality of joint play provides direct information about the freedom of movement at the articular surfaces and the integrity of the joint capsule and ligaments. Sufficient joint play is necessary for normal arthrokinematics.
Component Movement: These are involuntary joint motions that obligatorily accompany active osteokinematic movements but occur outside the specific joint where the primary motion takes place. A classic example is the upward rotation of the scapula that must accompany full shoulder abduction (scapulohumeral rhythm).
Arthrokinematic motions are biomechanically critical because osteokinematic movements are achieved through specific combinations of roll, glide, and spin. If these accessory movements are restricted (e.g., due to capsular tightness limiting glide), the overall physiological ROM (osteokinematics) will also be limited. Conversely, excessive or poorly controlled arthrokinematic motion, particularly excessive translation (glide), is the hallmark of joint instability.
The Interplay: Concave-Convex Rule
The relationship between the shape of the articulating surfaces and the direction of arthrokinematic glide relative to the osteokinematic movement is described by the concave-convex rule. This principle is fundamental for understanding normal joint mechanics and for guiding therapeutic interventions aimed at restoring motion.
Rule Statement:
- When a concave joint surface moves on a fixed convex surface, the arthrokinematic glide occurs in the same direction as the angular movement of the bone shaft. For example, during open-chain knee flexion (tibia moving on femur), the concave tibial plateau rolls and glides posteriorly on the convex femoral condyles.
- When a convex joint surface moves on a fixed concave surface, the arthrokinematic glide occurs in the opposite direction to the angular movement of the bone shaft. For example, during shoulder abduction (humerus moving on glenoid), the convex humeral head rolls superiorly but must glide inferiorly on the concave glenoid fossa to prevent impingement against the acromion.
Significance: Normal joint motion requires a precise combination of rolling and gliding to maintain joint surface contact and congruency throughout the ROM. If only rolling occurred, the moving bone would either impinge on adjacent structures or dislocate. The concave-convex rule allows clinicians to predict the direction of glide needed for a specific osteokinematic motion. If that glide is restricted, the corresponding osteokinematic motion will be limited. Therefore, manual therapy techniques often focus on restoring the appropriate glide, using the rule to determine the correct direction of mobilization force.
The interdependence of roll and glide is crucial. Osteokinematic motion necessitates both components occurring simultaneously to maintain joint integrity. Should the glide component be restricted, for instance by a tight posterior capsule limiting posterior glide of the humeral head, the superior roll during shoulder flexion or abduction will quickly lead to impingement of the humeral head against the acromion, halting further osteokinematic movement even if the capacity for rolling itself is not impaired. This underscores why assessing and restoring accessory glide, guided by the concave-convex rule, is often paramount in addressing limitations in physiological ROM.
Furthermore, disturbances in arthrokinematics may precede the development of noticeable limitations in gross osteokinematic ROM. Subtle restrictions in glide or spin might initially manifest as altered joint loading mechanics, increased stress on specific capsuloligamentous structures, or minor compensatory movements elsewhere in the kinetic chain, rather than an immediate, measurable decrease in the total degrees of motion. Over time, these altered biomechanics could contribute to pain syndromes, adaptive tissue changes (e.g., capsular thickening, degenerative changes ), or eventually progress to a clinically apparent loss of osteokinematic ROM. This suggests that identifying and addressing subtle arthrokinematic restrictions early may have preventative value.
Resources
